Submit your inquiry to speak to a Senior Lawyer
If you are facing an apprehended violence order (AVO), you should immediately consult an experienced Sydney AVO lawyer. An AVO can have consequences for your career, employment and ability to contact your family members, so getting the right representation is paramount.
Our team has been rated amongst the best AVO lawyers in Sydney and Parramatta, which is reflected by:
There are multiple avenues by which to advocate for your interests if you are faced with an AVO you see as unfair. Here’s a breakdown of how we can defend, fight and vary AVOs for our clients.
Defending an AVO refers to opposing the AVO in court if you disagree with it. The process unfolds in court, and includes:
The court will issue the AVO if it is satisfied that the protected person has reasonable grounds to fear the defendant. The standard of proof is on the balance of probabilities (i.e., more likely than not).
Fighting an AVO means challenging the factors that justify the AVO being made. To successfully fight the AVO, you must prove that the following factors are not present:
Additionally, the court may consider factors under Section 17(2) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act, including:
Varying an AVO refers to the process of changing the conditions of an AVO. You can vary an AVO by applying to the court to vary the conditions of the apprehended violence order. Generally, the applicant, protected person, defendant, or the police can apply. Applications need to be lodged at court and allocated a date on which they will be heard.
You should obtain legal advice from a specialist AVO lawyer if you are seeking to vary the conditions of an AVO or have the AVO revoked, as it can be a complex process. See our guide on how to vary an AVO for a more detailed breakdown of the process.
There are 4 key stages in the AVO process which can vary based on the nature of the situation. Astor Legal provides you with expert advice and representation at every stage of the AVO process.
The application stage is when the AVO is first requested and not yet enforceable. Typically, AVOs at this stage are either personal applications made directly to the court or domestic AVOs where the police haven’t found the situation serious enough to issue a provisional order.
A provisional AVO is enforceable. These are usually issued by a senior police officer in connection with an allegation of domestic violence. A provisional AVO remains enforceable until it is either revoked, made an interim order or final order, or it is withdrawn or dismissed.
An interim AVO is enforceable and is made by a court where it is deemed necessary and appropriate. Provisional orders are normally made into interim orders after the first court appearance. They remain enforceable until they are either revoked, made a final order, or it is withdrawn or dismissed.
A final AVO is enforceable and is usually made at the end of court proceedings. They are usually enforceable for one to two years, although this can be longer.
An apprehended violence order (AVO) is an order that restricts the behaviour of a person for the protection of another person.
The purpose of an AVO is to restrict a person from intimidating, harassing, stalking, assaulting, to even communicating with or being within a certain distance (e.g. 100 metres) of any person named as a ‘person in need of protection’ (PINOP).
There are some mandatory conditions that come with an AVO, and then there are other optional conditions. These conditions restrict the behaviour of the person on whom the AVO is imposed.
An AVO may place restrictions on what you can and cannot do. Some common examples of conditions in NSW are:
There are two types of AVOs, and we are experienced in defending both. Here is an explanation of each type of AVO and what they mean.
Apprehended Domestic Violence Orders (ADVOs) are made when there is or has been a domestic relationship between two people. The definition of domestic relationship is very broad. If police are contacted in relation to a domestic incident there are circumstances where they must apply for an apprehended violence order.
This can occur even if the alleged victim in the matter expressly indicates that they do not want an AVO to be applied for. Police are legally required to make an application for an apprehended violence order if they believe that a domestic violence offence:
Apprehended Personal Violence Orders (APVOs) are made when there is no domestic relationship between the parties. These are common where the dispute is between neighbours.
Except in the case of serious assaults, police do not generally apply for a personal AVO on someone’s behalf. In most instances a personal AVO is initiated by the applicant attending court and making an application through the registrar.
When faced with an AVO, getting the best defence is important for your peace of mind and to avoid serious consequences. If you’re dealing with an AVO, trust the expertise of Astor Legal, led by Avinash Singh. As one of Australia’s top criminal lawyers and an Accredited Specialist, Mr Singh has successfully defended hundreds of AVO applications, helping clients achieve favorable outcomes.
With over ten years of experience and a track record of success, including representing elite sportspeople like Andrew Johns, Astor Legal who you want fighting for you. Contact Astor Legal today for expert AVO defence.
Violating an AVO in NSW is considered a criminal offence, which can result in immediate arrest and charges. The police have the authority to arrest you for breaching an AVO. If convicted, you could face up to 2 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $5,500.
An AVO will not give you a criminal record. If, however, you are found guilty of breaching an AVO, you may receive a criminal conviction.
If the duration of the order is not specified by the court, it will remain in effect for two years from the date the order is issued if the defendant is an adult, and one year from the date the order is issued if the defendant is under 18.
Police usually issue an AVO for you if they deem it necessary. However, you can apply for a private AVO directly through the registrar at your local court. Unlike a police-issued AVO, a private AVO does not require police approval, so you can apply for one even if the police have declined to issue it for you.
No. As an AVO is not a criminal conviction, it will not appear on any Police check. What are the grounds for an AVO in NSW?
You can apply to the Local Court to change or revoke a final AVO. To do so, you must:
See our guide on getting an AVO dropped. If the protected person is under 16, only the police can apply to change or revoke the AVO.
You can seek the other side to pay your legal costs pursuant to Section 99 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 1999 (NSW).
In private AVO matters, costs can be awarded If they are just and reasonable if the other side’s application for the AVO was frivolous or vexatious.
However, under Section 99A of the Act, costs can only be ordered against a Police application for an AVO if Police knew the application contained matters that were false or misleading.
For a no obligation phone evaluation by an expert criminal and traffic lawyer call
free case evaluation See our Recent ResultsLevel 3 Suite 5/1 Horwood Place, Parramatta
4.9 169 reviews
Our client is an IT professional in a senior leadership role within Australia.
Late last year he came to know his daughter had been taken advantage of by a colleague of his while she was in a vulnerable mental state. Our client held concerns for his daughter and his granddaughter’s welfare.
Consequently, he attended his colleague’s residence to speak to him about his intentions towards his daughter and his disapproval of their relationship. A heated argument took place between our client, his colleague and our client’s son.
Nine days later the colleague contacted Police claiming he had fears for his safety and required an AVO. The Police took an AVO against our client.
Our client contacted us wanting to know how to beat an AVO. We began the process of attempting to have the matter withdrawn. Despite our representations, police insisted they wanted to press on with the matter – in large part due to the colleague wanting the AVO to remain.
We arranged the taking of witness statements from our client’s son and his friend who were present when the argument took place. We also filed a statement from our client detailing what actually occurred and that it was merely a heated argument.
The case proceeded at Burwood Local Court where the police officer in charge of the matter gave evidence. Upon cross-examination by one of our AVO lawyers, we were able to expose the investigation of the matter as being inadequate, as the police officer conceded that she had not contacted the witnesses who had been present at the time of the argument.
During cross-examination of the complainant, we were able to expose the fact that he did not ask our client to leave his home at any time. We also highlighted the delay in his complaint to police which pointed to his lack of fear. These factors were emphasised in our closing submissions
The Court was ultimately not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the PINOP had fears for his safety as as such they dismissed the AVO application. Our client and his family were overjoyed with the result and can now continue with their lives
Astor Legal recently represented a client in an Apprehended Violence Order (AVO) matter where his parents were the Persons in Need of Protection (PINOPs).
Our client’s mother called police while our client was having a mental health episode. When police arrived they were quick to apply for an AVO against our client for the protection of his mother.
Our client approached us days before the first appearance at Parramatta Local Court. He explained that his mother did not want the AVO to be in place.
We commenced working on the case. First, we arranged for our client’s mother to obtain independent legal advice and prepare a statement supporting the AVO being withdrawn. She also set out that the Defendant is not a violent or aggressive person and does not pose a threat to her safety.
Further, we had our client commence psychological treatment with a detailed treatment plan for the next 12 months. The PINOP confirmed that her primary concern was the Defendant’s mental well-being rather than any fear for her safety.
We then drafted representations that highlighted a number of issues with the Prosecution’s case. These included that the PINOP did not provide a written statement to the Police, as required by the Local Court Practice Note No. 2 of 2012. We also highlights the relevant factors under Section 16 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007.
Ultimately, the police accepted our representations and agreed to withdraw the AVO.
This outcome allowed our client to avoid an ADVO, resume their normal life, and focus on addressing personal issues.
Our client is a 32-year-old man from America living with his husband in Australia. Police were called to their house after a complaint was made by their neighbours who suspected a domestic incident.
Our client and his partner explained to police that our client had recently had major surgery following a motor vehicle accident and that they did not want police intervention. Despite this, officers applied for an apprehended violence order (AVO) against our client.
Our client came to us extremely upset at the situation and stressed with the thought of proceedings against him.
We immediately got to work advising him of the process of AVO proceedings and drafted lengthy representations for the withdrawal of the AVO. Because our client had instructed us early on, we were able to file representations prior to the first court date.
The case was listed at Manly Local Court where police sought an adjournment to determine our representations for the withdrawal of the AVO.
Ultimately, Police were persuaded through our negotiations to withdraw the AVO early in the proceedings.
Our client and his husband were overjoyed, and can now live their lives without concerns of an AVO affecting their future.
Our client is a 25-year-old man who had been in a relationship with his female partner for 3 years.
One night our client had a verbal argument with her at their apartment where she accused him of cheating on him.
The argument escalated and she attempted to slap him, threw her phone at him and spat at him.
Unbeknownst to him, a few days later she contacted Police and reported that he had punched her in the head and arms, spat on her and thrown her phone at her.
She also alleged that our client had called her the next day and threatened to kill her.
Police took photographs of bruises to her arms, a black eye, a cut on her lip and the phone which had a chipped screen. A video statement was also recorded.
Police arrested and charged our client with:
They also applied for an Apprehended Violence Order (AVO).
Our client came to us aghast that he had been charged.
We immediately obtained his instructions as to what had actually occurred and formulated a strategy to have the charges dismissed.
First, we asked our client to provide screenshots of all messages sent between himself and his partner around the time of the incident. The messages from the days after the incident showed his partner apologising for her behaviour.
The messages also showed that our client was fed up with his partner’s behaviour and had attempted to end the relationship after the argument.
We also subpoenaed phone records of the partner. These revealed that there was no phone call between our client and her on the day of the alleged threat.
Further, we issued subpoenas to the building for CCTV which showed her having no injuries after the argument.
At the Hearing, we expertly cross-examined her and were able to establish that our client was innocent.
The magistrate dismissed all of the charges and the AVO against our client.
An application was then made for legal costs against police.
We cross-examined the Police officer in charge as to his failure to investigate the phone records, messages and CCTV.
The Magistrate also granted costs against Police due to their failure to adequately investigate.
We have now made a formal request for criminal charges to be brought against the complainant for making a false complaint.
Our client is jubilant with the outcome and is considering civil proceedings against his ex-partner.
Last week Astor Legal was again successful in persuading police to withdraw an Apprehended Violence Order (AVO).
Our client was an international student who recently moved into shared accommodation with a friend. The pair started arguing which resulted in Police being called to their house by another friend.
Our client came to us distressed, particularly because of the possible impact of the AVO on his employment prospects and citizenship in Australia.
Despite receiving advice from other lawyers that he needed to wait for the hearing date – some 12 months away – our client came to us looking for another solution.
We showed him our previous cases where we were successful in having domestic violence charges and the AVO withdrawn.
Despite the Person in Need of Protection (PINOP) insisting on the AVO proceeding, we were able to obtain statements from our client and other housemates which cast doubt on the version of events the PINOP had told police.
We then drafted lengthy representations for the withdrawal of the AVO prior to the Hearing date. Critical parts of our representations included our client’s version of the events, the prosecution’s failure to call witnesses and the defendant and PINOP having no form of contact with one another since the application for the AVO was filed.
Ultimately the Police were persuaded through our negotiations to withdraw the AVO early in the proceedings.
Despite the Hearing date still being almost a year away, our team of specialist Burwood AVO lawyers were able to liaise with Burwood Local Court to have the matter listed earlier to formally withdraw the AVO.
We appeared on our client’s behalf and the court was persuaded to AVO formally dismiss.
Our client was overjoyed with not just AVO being withdrawn, but also saving much time and expense associated with proceeding to Hearing.