Property Damage Lawyers Sydney & Parramatta - Astor Legal

Request callback





    Property Damage

    Get A Free Case EvaluationHave a legal issue?

    Submit your inquiry to speak to a Senior Lawyer






      Best Intentionally or Recklessly Destroy or Damage Property Lawyers

      Our destroy or damage property lawyers are well-versed in defending such charges. We have an outstanding track record of helping our clients prove their innocence and avoid criminal convictions.

      You can view some of our recent cases for these charges by clicking here.

      Contact us now to speak to our accredited specialist criminal lawyer to see how we can best assist you.

      Property damage

      The charge of destroying or damaging property is commonly known as ‘malicious damage’ and it involves destroying or damaging property either intentionally or recklessly.

      Usually the property is owned by someone else but you can also be convicted if you destroy or damage property that you jointly own with someone else.

      The definition of destroying or damaging may seem obvious but it can also include what is known as “temporary functional derangement”. This means that the function or usefulness of an object has been interfered with. It may not be “damaged” in the usual sense but the object cannot do what it is meant to do because of some interference.

      Common examples are letting the air out of someone’s tyres or urinating in a police cell so that it cannot be used.

      To prove the offence of destroy or damage property the prosecution must prove that the defendant, recklessly or intentionally, destroyed or damaged property belonging to either another person or the defendant and another person.

      The penalties for this offence in the Local Court are up to 2 years imprisonment and fines of up to $11,000. The penalties are significantly higher if the matter is heard in the District Court or if the damage involves fire or explosives, or is committed during a public order incident or with the intent to injure someone.

      If you are under investigation, have been arrested, charged for destroying and damaging property, house breaking implements or charged for aggravated breaking and entering you should contact us for expert advice immediately. At Astor Legal we are former prosecutors and we have prosecuted countless destroying or damaging property charges. We know the law, the cases, and the defences to destroying or damaging property charges. Your first consultation is free and we offer fixed fees for most of our services.

      WHAT SHOULD I DO?

      • PLEADING NOT GUILTY

        What is Destroy or Damage Property?

        Section 195 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) sets out that if you intentionally or recklessly destroy or damage the property of another person, you can be guilty of this offence. The offence is also known as ‘malicious damage to property’.

        This is a ‘Table 2’ offence under the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW). As such, it is finalised in the Local Court unless the prosecution elects to deal with it in the District Court.

        It is rare for a damage property charge to be heard in the District Court unless there are associated serious charges being heard in the District Court.

        How do you beat a Destroy or Damage Property?

        You can fight a destroy or damage property charge in two ways. Firstly, the prosecution must prove each of the following beyond reasonable doubt:

        1. You intentionally or recklessly damaged property; and
        2. That property belonged to another person; or
        3. You owned it jointly with another person and they did not consent to you destroying or damaging property

        If any of these elements are not made out, then you can be found ‘not guilty’.

        Secondly, you can rely on one of the defences.

        What is malicious damage to property?

        In order to establish damage, the prosecution must prove that the physical integrity of the property was altered in some way. This includes if the alteration is temporary (Grajewski v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] HCA 8).

        However, if there is no alteration to the physical integrity of the property, then there is no offence. For example, spitting on a metal seat would generally not be considered damage (Hammond v R [2013] NSWCCA 93).

        Contact us now to speak to a specialist criminal lawyer who can begin preparing your defence.

        What are the Defences to ‘destroy or damage property’?

        The following are a number of defences which can be raised:

        1. Claim of right: You genuinely believed you were entitled to the property
        2. Causation: The prosecution cannot prove that you caused the property to be destroyed or damaged.
        3. Identification: the prosecution cannot prove that you were responsible for the destruction or damage
        4. Intent: The prosecution cannot prove that you had the intention, or that you were reckless in destroying or damaging the property
        5. Duress: You were forced to destroy or damage the property
        6. Necessity: Your damage to, or destruction of,

        Our team’s specialty is getting charges dropped early saving you money and time. If any of the above defences apply to you, our senior lawyers will analyse the evidence, strengthen your defence, and begin negotiations with police to get your charge dropped early. They have been successful at achieving this for over 20 years on countless cases they take on.

      • PLEADING GUILTY

        If you are pleading guilty to a charge of destroying or damaging property, you can consult our guide. You can obtain a tailored approach to your case by contacting us now to speak to a specialist criminal lawyer who can prepare your case and appear for you in Court.

        What is the penalty for Destroy or Damage Property?

        There are number of different variations and degrees of severity for property damage offences.

        If heard in the District Court, the maximum penalty for Destroy or damage property is a term of imprisonment of 5 years. If the offence was committed while in the company of another person, the maximum penalty becomes 6 years imprisonment.

        If heard in the Local Court and:

        1. the value of the property damaged is less than $5000, the maximum penalty is 12 months imprisonment and/or a fine of $5,500. Where the value is less than $2000, the maximum fine is up to $2,200;
        2. the value of the property damaged is more than $5000, the maximum penalty is 2 years imprisonment.

        If heard in the District Court and the damage or destruction is caused by fire or explosives, the maximum penalty is increased to 10 years imprisonment. If the offence was committed while in the company of another person, the maximum penalty becomes 11 years imprisonment.

        What are the Possible Sentences for destroying or damaging property?

        • Section 10 dismissal
        • Conditional release order without conviction (previously known as Section 10 good behaviour bond)
        • Fine
        • Conditional release order with conviction (previously known as Section 9 good behaviour bond)
        • Community Corrections Order (previously known as Community Service Order)
        • Intensive Corrections Order
        • Home Detention Order (no longer used in NSW)
        • Full Time Imprisonment

        Will you go to jail for damaging property?

        Of the 255 cases heard in the Local Court over the last 5 years, less than 25% of people received no conviction for a destroy or damage property charge. 6% of people were sentenced to some form of imprisonment. The remaining offenders all received convictions.

        Over 75% of offenders are convicted. A Section 10 dismissal is not easy to achieve. As such, if you wish to avoid a conviction, you should speak to one of our specialist criminal defence solicitors for destroy or damage property charges.

      FAQ

      Is property damage a criminal offence?

      Yes. Section 195 of the Crimes Act 1900 sets out the offence of destroying or damaging property.

      Can I be guilty of damaging my own property?

      If you jointly owned the property with another person then you can be found guilty of malicious damage.

      However, if you are the sole owner of property, then you cannot be found guilty of destroying or damaging it.

      Much will depend on whether you can prove you are the sole owner. Receipts and bank statements are often used in Court to prove that you own the property outright.

      Property Damage Areas

      Client Reviews

      Astor Legal IconAstor Legal

      Level 3 Suite 5/1 Horwood Place, Parramatta

      4.9 169 reviews

      • Avatar Barry Wang ★★★★★ in the last week
        I cannot speak highly enough of the team at Astor Legal. Their deep understanding of the Australian justice system and their strategic approach played a critical role in my case. Thanks to their exceptional guidance and advocacy, the prosecution … More ultimately decided to withdraw the false charges against me.
        Throughout the entire process, communication with the team was efficient and seamless. They were always responsive, clear, and incredibly professional. I was genuinely impressed not only by their legal expertise but also by their commitment to supporting me every step of the way.
        If you or someone you know is facing legal troubles, I strongly recommend reaching out to Astor Legal as soon as possible. Their dedication and professionalism can truly make a difference.
      • Avatar ABD ★★★★★ a month ago
        I am so grateful for the way Astor Legal, particularly Mr Isaac Hoballah and Mr Avinash Singh handled my NSW Supreme Court bail application. The process was incredibly fast, smooth, and stress-free. They didn’t overwhelm me with unnecessary … More details, just clear, timely communication when it was needed. Their professionalism and efficiency made a difficult situation much easier to navigate. Thanks to their expertise, everything was handled quickly and successfully. If you’re looking for a lawyer or law firm who gets results without the hassle, I highly recommend Astor Legal and their team!
      • Avatar Burc Tt ★★★★★ a year ago
        I've been charged by police for a sensitive matter and I reached to Astor Legal in the middle of process after I changed 2 lawyers.That was one of the best decision I've ever made. Avinash was my lawyer and i've been found … More not guilty at defended hearing, thanks to Avinash.Avinash is very experienced, calm and confident lawyer. His communication, preperation and submissions at defended hearing couldn't be better .If you need a lawyer, I recommend him 100%. Thank you Avinash, I can breath again.
      • Avatar Vinni Kumar ★★★★★ 2 years ago
        Avinash’s work in my matter was outstanding. I have received the best outcome that I thought was impossible to be achieved.
        Before going to Avinash, I have seen 4 other lawyers, I can confidently say I made the best decision going to him
        … More and his team at Astor Legal. I went to him with a complex matter, which other solicitors at other firms could not provide any good result. Avinash’s attention to detail is exceptional, on first appointment he has given me clear overview and possible outcomes and ways to go ahead, that day I could see his knowledge in the field.
        He was always professional, calm and empathetic. He answered all my questions with patience and suggested the best options to go with. I could trust him 100% with all decisions in my matter. His fee was reasonable and he gave 10 times better to what he charged me. I was fully confident and satisfied with his work, I never had any hesitation as he made everything clear. He keeps all communications and discussions transparent and well informed, which gave me confidence and peace of mind.
        Enis was also really helpful in my matter, his representation in court was impressive. He was kind and empathetic while being professional. His support has helped me overcome stress while my matter was going on.
        I cannot thank enough Avinash and his team for the exceptional work they did and the best outcome I have received. They are the best..!!
      • Avatar Jeffry Paulson ★★★★★ a year ago
        Their expertise and professionalism have truly impressed me. They demonstrated an exceptional level of knowledge and understanding of the legal matters at hand, providing thorough guidance and advice throughout the process. Avinash's … More strong attention to detail and effective communication skills were evident in every interaction. Moreover, they exhibited great dedication, always ensuring my best interests were prioritized. I am grateful for their exceptional legal representation and would highly recommend their services to anyone seeking a competent and reliable lawyer.Thank you Avinash singh and team

      Recent Damage Property Cases

      • Domestic violence assault and damage property charges withdrawn
      • Our client is a 45-year-old man who is self-employed.

        One night our client had a verbal argument his wife.

        She called the Police and alleged that our client had pulled her hair and smashed her phone.

        Our client denied pulling her hair but agreed that he had smashed her phone.

        He also told us that he had bought his wife’s phone and that it was registered in his name.

        Sometime after our client was charged and had an Apprehended Violence Order (AVO) taken out, his wife decided that she did not want the case to proceed.

        Our client advised us that she contacted the police but they advised her that they would not be withdrawing the charges or AVO.

        We immediately began preparing our defence strategy.

        First, we obtained an affidavit from the phone company which confirmed the phone was registered in our client’s name.

        We then sent our client’s wife to an independent lawyer with a view to preparing a retraction statement.

        The statement detailed:

        1. That the phone was the property of our client;
        2. That our client had not pulled her hair but rather was trying to stop her from headbutting a cabinet.

        The statement was sent to Police along with detailed ‘representations’ for the withdrawal of all charges.

        We stated that if the charges were not withdrawn, we would make an application for Police to pay our client’s legal costs.

        Ultimately, and despite their previous position, Police decided to withdraw both charges and the AVO against our client.

      • Domestic violence assault charges, intimidation charges and damage property charges dismissed and costs ordered against Police
      • Our client is a 25-year-old man who had been in a relationship with his female partner for 3 years.

        One night our client had a verbal argument with her at their apartment where she accused him of cheating on him.

        The argument escalated and she attempted to slap him, threw her phone at him and spat at him.

        Unbeknownst to him, a few days later she contacted Police and reported that he had punched her in the head and arms, spat on her and thrown her phone at her.

        She also alleged that our client had called her the next day and threatened to kill her.

        Police took photographs of bruises to her arms, a black eye, a cut on her lip and the phone which had a chipped screen. A video statement was also recorded.

        Police arrested and charged our client with:

        1. Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm;
        2. Common Assault;
        3. Stalk and Intimidate;
        4. Destroy and Damage Property;
        5. Use Carriage Service to menace.

        They also applied for an Apprehended Violence Order (AVO).

        Our client came to us aghast that he had been charged.

        We immediately obtained his instructions as to what had actually occurred and formulated a strategy to have the charges dismissed.

        First, we asked our client to provide screenshots of all messages sent between himself and his partner around the time of the incident. The messages from the days after the incident showed his partner apologising for her behaviour.

        The messages also showed that our client was fed up with his partner’s behaviour and had attempted to end the relationship after the argument.

        We also subpoenaed phone records of the partner. These revealed that there was no phone call between our client and her on the day of the alleged threat.

        Further, we issued subpoenas to the building for CCTV which showed her having no injuries after the argument.

        At the Hearing, we expertly cross-examined her and were able to establish that our client was innocent.

        The magistrate dismissed all of the charges and the AVO against our client.

        An application was then made for legal costs against police.

        We cross-examined the Police officer in charge as to his failure to investigate the phone records, messages and CCTV.

        The Magistrate also granted costs against Police due to their failure to adequately investigate.

        We have now made a formal request for criminal charges to be brought against the complainant for making a false complaint.

        Our client is jubilant with the outcome and is considering civil proceedings against his ex-partner.

      • No Conviction for Damage Property Charge
      • Our client was a 39-year-old construction manager who was living in an apartment in Sydney. On the day of the incident he returned to his apartment’s parking lot and saw another vehicle in his designated parking spot.

        Initially he left a note on the windscreen of the vehicle. However, when he came back 30 minutes later, the vehicle was still there. In the heat of the moment, he removed the note from the windscreen and scratched the driver side door.

        CCTV footage captured the incident and our client was subsequently charged and given a court date at Downing Centre Local Court.

        He came to us concerned about the impact a criminal conviction could have on him. We immediately got to work by arranging for him to see a forensic psychologist to determine whether he had any anger management issues.

        We also obtained character references which spoke to his role as a manager in the construction industry as well as possible ramifications of a conviction. His partner also provided a reference setting out the possible ramifications for their partner visa application.

        At Court we made submissions seeking a non-conviction. The Magistrate agreed and placed him on a conditional release order without conviction. Our client and his partner were overjoyed at the result.

      • No Conviction for Domestic Violence Offences
      • Our client is a 35-year-old father living in Zetland with his pregnant wife and 7-year-old child.

        He had recently completed a university degree in project management and was searching for work.

        Prior to finding a job he was charged with stalk/intimidate and destroy/damage property over an incident in the family home. Police alleged that our client had threatened to drag his wife out of the home. He had also kicked a door and caused significant damage to it.

        He initially went to another criminal law firm but grew frustrated with their lack of results after spending a significant sum of money.

        He came to us desperate to avoid a conviction.

        We immediately got to work preparing the case. First, we enrolled our client with a psychologist for anger management counselling.

        Next, we obtained letters from other in the project management industry detailing the impact a conviction would have on his prospects of gaining employment. We also had our client repair the door at his own expense.

        We attended Downing Centre Local Court with our client. Despite initially facing significant resistance from the Magistrate, we were able to persuade Her Honour to not record a conviction.

        Our client was extremely grateful and has since obtained employment as a project manager for a large multi-national firm.